Posts Tagged ‘NWO

05
Sep
09

Poison the planet and make the victims pay – Political Ponerology or the genesis of evil

I have been looking into industrial chemicals and their toxicity for some time, and yesterday decided to do a little experiment to check a sneaking suspicion. As usual the whole thing ended up going a lot further…

Poisoning the Planet


I wandered around my house making a list of items picked completely at random from every room, kitchen to bathroom (even including some food, drink, cosmetics, ornaments, gadgets, decorations, gifts; you name it… I then divided the list of objects into two groups: those that were produced by an old traditional method: craftsman, individual or artist on one side – so this included everything from pottery to ornaments, to a cheese, a bottle of wine, hand-made clothes, wooden furniture etc to make list A and then into list B went all the things that were industrially designed and mass produced – this included things like packaged foods, sauces, all cosmetics, cleaning products and soaps, gadgets, computers, “Ikea” style furniture, even carpets. I then took each item on both lists and examined it’s ingredients or components for… toxicity !

After a bit of research and some internet searches I made two more lists: toxic and non-toxic, putting all the items containing plastics that reduce fertility, molecules that damage the brain or nervous system, heavy metals that slowly poison you, etc into one list and all the products that contained virtually no toxins or none at all into the other.

It became shockingly obvious first of all that the list of household items containing nasty ingredients was far longer than the “safe item” list, and secondly, a large number of the items on random list A were non-toxic  whereas every single industrially designed, mass produced item on my random list B was on the “toxic/poisonous” list – every single item contained some form of environmentally unfriendly molecule or health imparing toxin – usually quite a few… Even clingfilm wrap used on supermarket food is not exempt, containing petrochemicals that impair fertility and slowly poison you. The worst item was an old computer stuffed with a scary number of toxic, environmentaly disasterous components, but a lot of cosmetics and bathroom items were pretty high on the list too. It seems that things you put on your skin (especially women, with men being the dogs that they are) every day are pretty nasty; full of petrochemicals that cause nerve & brain damage, cancer, spinal damage, etc.

It’s startling to discover that you are washing your hair and cleaning your teeth with products that are also used as anti-freeze, engine degreasers and solvents !

Now, this is when my blood starts to boil and my “caustic paranoid” analysis system wants to leap into the situation and devour it’s prey !

How come for most of human history people have made things for each other either for trade or some form of community or family service, without having to include enviro-toxins and poisons for free with every product, except on rare occasions when total ignorance was involved – mad hatters and mercury comes to mind, as do Romans and their lead piping ? What has changed in our contemporary society that obliges our globalised, commitee designed, mass produced stuff to be so bad for the environment and ourselves ? Especially as we do not have the excuse of ignorance – most petrochemical or other synthetics and molecules have been studied to death by our military-industrial complex decades ago, and the effects of nearly every one thoroughly understood.

It seems that as every year passes, as more and more of the “old fashioned craftsmen” and their “outdated methods” dissappear, and more small family businesses are replaced by ever-merging, ever huger corporations, the products our society becomes inundated with become more and more toxic and dangerous. The evidence surrounds us and is staggering.

I can think of several reasons:

To start with small local businesses and craftsmen in the vast majority of cases previously had a personal relationship with their customers, so had to take complaints directly. Have you ever tried to complain to Unilever or Nestlé because you think their products are poisoning your kids ? The process isn’t quite as simple as it used to be… Who benefits from the change ? Certainly not the customer.

Add to that the modus operandi of corporate “culture”, where everything revolves around the “bottom line” and while presenting a PR reinforced facade of ethical behaviour for the public, only practice ethics in their business if it is profitable. If it is cheaper – including legal costs if they get caught – to get something done in an unethical or even illegal way, then a big corporation will probably go for it – as long as the bottom line is maintained at all costs. I witnessed this personally years back, working for a branch of Pepsi co. and at another time for Total Fina Elf. Both companies maintained a carefuly smiling facade while getting up to corporate practices of a cynicism and (for Elf) disdain for the rule of law – and human life – that were pretty shocking for me, youngster that I was in the world of internationalised evil. I won’t go into what they were up to here – maybe in another post once I’ve checked with a lawyer. These days they can poison humanity and get away with it, but if you accuse them the wrong way you can get into a lot of trouble !

The reason my blood boils is that fewer and fewer people end up owning more and more of the world every year – in 2008 there were 793 Billionnaires with a combined worth of $ 2,400,000,000,000 – far more than the combined worth of the three billion poorest people on the planet (Forbes) – and these mega rich tend to be the ones owning all these vast globalised industries that produce poisonous products to sell to the rest of us. Not only does this not seem to bother them, but if you look around you find many papers and publications produced over the last 100 years actually advocating the practice in the name of depopulation, or other Malthusian or Fabian ideologies. I think those are just polite pretexts to, as the Dead Kennedys band would put it: Kill, kill, kill the poor !”

Political Ponerology


If you want to push things even further, far from mentioning some conspiracy theory – though they abound – I would encourage everyone to read a highly thought-provoking book – almost mind-blowing – called Political Ponerology by Andrew M. Lobaczewski. This amazing book, suppressed for over 50 years, first by the communists, then the Vatican, and last by Brzezinski himself before eventually breaking out into the light of day is the result of decades of research by a team of Polish scientists on psychopaths and their effect as a group on society. I will go into it in depth in another post – I might even devote a special page to the subject, it’s so important. But for a good list of quotes in the mean time, look here.

It’s not very surprising the Communists, the Vatican and Brzezinski were so worried about a book describing how a certain category of psychopaths were supremely equipped psychologicaly to rise fast to the top positions in society, which they would then dominate, and transform slowly into entire institutions with psychopathic deviant behaviour, despite the fact that psychopaths only represent 4-6% of the population ? And the more repressive and irrational the culture, the more people undergo the stresses and pressures that can “push them over the edge” and make them imitate psychopathic behaviour patterns or “go psycho” themselves. A very viscious circle. Very visible too, these days !

What characterises a psychopath ? Total lack of feeling for another person’s emotions – they seem to lack the part of the brain enabling any form of empathy – this allows them to become pitiless masters of manipulation – a very important aspect of hardcore psychos – and capable of inflicting huge pain, killing or causing many deaths without feeling the slightest guilt or remorse. Most of them don’t even understand the concept of guilt or remorse except as an expoitable weakness in their victims. They also learn early to hide extremely well their lack of empathy by simulating emotions they observe, which gives many of them a great capacity for charm – until you get to know them better, or become a victim to their games. Disturbingly, many psychopaths are completely aware of their condition and resent their small numbers compared to the rest of humanity. Apparently most psychopaths are capable of recognising another psychopath almost instantly. Now that must help with the networking !

A psychopath is either born with cerebral lesions (often congenital), is brain-damaged after birth (accident, chemical exposure, drugs, etc…) or survives extreme physical or psychological pressure (torture, sexual abuse, etc..)by effectively suppressing the most human part of his personality definitively. It seems that when one doesn’t use the parts of the brain related to empathy and emotions for a while, they wither away.

One would think that the top positions of our governments, banks and corporations would be ideal for such deviants, where they can make decisions affecting and manipulating multitudes, order the deaths of huge numbers of people without batting an eyelid, and generally get a rush playing with the lives of the ants… And just getting to that position requires so much back-stabbing ! What fun !

It would also go towards explaining why they decide, out of a vast array of materials and chemicals available, to choose the subtely toxic ones for the mass produced products we use every day. I would like someone to find a better explanation. Even the bottom line argument has it’s limits when you see that some dangerous ingredients of household products actually cost more than their safe counterparts.

The book is compellingly written, the evidence almost irrefutable – even down to brain lesions that are found in extreme psychopaths that also occur in the brains of a certain class of politician or corporate leader, or the documented influence of a psychopath in a position of authority that attracts other psychopaths of a lesser stripe, and even worse, forces normal people in the vicinity to emulate sociopathic behaviour in order to survive. Then you have entire societies run by psychopaths, where sick behaviour becomes the norm enforced by the police and army, who become themselves considerably disturbed through an “entrainment” effect.

Reminds me of a day in the office – in the days when I was in an office.

Remember the Nazis, the Stazi, the Stalinist purges, or the Shah’s regime ? Extreme cases but far from isolated…

The scientists who wrote the book lived through the harshest years of communism, and studied the behaviour and actual brains of many nasty officials and political leaders, as well as a lot of criminals and psychopaths. It is quite frightening when many of the factors used in the book to recognise a psychopathocracy are currently present in many governments around the world, nearly all multinational corporations and in global institutions…

So what happens when you have a bunch of hugely wealthy and powerful psychopaths lording it over the more human majority of the population (we’re not brain damaged, remember ?…).

You just have to open the newspaper to bear witness to the disaster.

One problem psychopathocracies have is that often people are recruited to positions of importance for their psychopathic characteristics and not their actual talent at whatever they are supposed to be doing, which leads to huge inefficiency and irrational, often dangerous situations for the multitudes of citizens unlucky enough to bear the brunt of their decisions.

Terrorism ? Global Warming ? Epidemics ? These pose minimal danger compared to the daily activities of psychopaths in power that happily play the games that start the wars, financial collapses and other societal disasters that effect our lives irreversibly. Not to mention the permanent psychological damage caused to entire populations by their depredations. They are really laughing at getting the general populace to pay for their environmental damage, financial and social parasitism, and genocidal wars. We ignorantly foot the bill every time…

In the same way you judge a tree by it’s fruits, you can judge a society by it’s products.

I think we should have mandatory testing for psychopathic tendencies for everyone in any kind of position of authority. Some very good tests exist – lie detectors do not work on a psychopath. Until that is done, there is a daily growing movement around the world that will point out their every abuse, manipulation or mistake on every kind of media until the situation becomes clear for enough people to change it.

And who knows, just doing that might change the world.


Advertisements
25
Aug
09

Healthy food will be made illegal on December 31, 2009

As part of their worldwide power grab and multi-spectrum assault on humanity at the behest of our lovely benevolent global elites, the NGO mammoths – unfortunately far from extinction – WHO and UN created the “Codex Alimentarius Commision” in 1963, in order to ensure the worldwide implementation and policing of universal diet control. Like many other organisations that have almost no oversight (except sometimes by other NGO’s or foundations with vested interests and no oversight themselves) big business took over shortly after the right players were put in control of the commission, and the Codex Alimentarius (CA) guidelines rapidly became a really nasty set of rules favouring corporate profits over the wellbeing of the masses – in fact going so far as proposing rules that will guarantee bad health for all to keep big Pharma happy ! The Codex will be implemented worldwide (at least, in 180 odd countries) on December 31, 2009 unless there is enough legal resistance from the many concerned professionals.

I’ve been reading up on this for a while – there is plenty of info out there because so many nutritionists and therapists of all stripes are utterly flabergasted about the sheer gall these NGOs have in dictating insane behaviour to the world that will – with absolute certainty – reduce significantly the health of the entire human race while benefitting hugely big Pharma and GM food giants.

Here is a good summary of the situation:

I encourage everyone to do their own research on this…

Nutrients classified as toxins ??? Vitamins and minerals removed from food ??? Information on nutrition to be suppressed ??? Irradiation for all foods not locally grown ??? Mandated growth hormone for all cows worldwide ??? Vitamin supplements to be legally limited to tiny ineffective doses… Excuse me, but WTF is this madness ?????

If they had passed this law a few years ago, I would probably be dead, because I survived catching SARS by using massive doses of organic vitamin C (and a bit of vitamin D alongside); in fact I have recovered from 95% of my health problems over my life by boosting my immune system one way or another using healthy means – not any form of chemical medecine.

Many of the directives of CA ban any possibility – actually make it illegal in most cases – of taking care of one’s own health and enforce the synthetic molecular solutions of the pharmaceutical groups while effectively banning a whole bushel of healthy solutions. I’m not at all against people taking chemical medecine when they have a life-threatening disease, but people should be warned that in traditional chinese medecine diagnostics we have found that every synthetic molecule that enters a person affects negatively the liver and kidneys and lowers fertility over time, whatever other effects it has. And there are many, many natural solutions to most ailments out there for anyone willing to do a bit of research.

Well I guess anyone who didn’t believe in the capacity for such organisations to promulgate pure evil will wake up and smell the coffee this time – if the mainstream media actually ends up telling anyone anything truthful about it.

I find it remarkable how a similar modus operandi seems to apply to most of the areas of human need. A “high and mighty” NGO steps in to “help the needy” in whatever area, thus filling a space that sincerely benevolent individuals might have otherwise occupied – and done some real good – and immediately proceeds to be as inefficient and damaging as possible in whatever area they have injected themselves into with a maximum public display of arrogance and the “moral high ground” to provide a smokescreen. I’ve run into NGOs big and small, all over the world and it seems the only 100% honest devoted ones are the kind set up by naive university students – I’ve worked with a few of them and they are easily many times more efficient , cost effective and useful than the big boys despite having tiny ressources. I’ve caught out the others doing everything from fraud and kickbacks to government to eliminate private competition (a lot of that in Asia), to prostitution and human trafficking (remember the UN prostitution rings in ex-yugoslavia ?)

I’ll post in more detail about NGO corruption sometime – it’s not edifying and people should know what these gangs are up to. They include the World Bank and IMF…

I might add that in the contemporary world, NGO’s have more lobbying power on our governments than any amount of voters, and by pretending to represent other people’s interests have an impact on legislation and government action that completely bypasses the democratic process.

People have been conditioned into believing NGOs are good, independant, apolitical bodies when nothing could be farther from the truth. They are often merely fronts for the vested interests of huge foundations, financial groups or wealthy clans. I have sat at a “Save the Children” auction gala dinner in Hong Kong with all the rich and famous clique where manifestly most of the money donated by good caring people went into paying for an absolutely lavish gourmet feast with the finest wines and foods in one of the most expensive venues in HK, for the organisers, their cronies and all their friends. They even hired expensive actors to pretend to be their “humanitarian workers” and spew emotionaly charged stories about the poor children of Africa hoping to raise more money for their parties. Needless to say, it didn’t go down very well when, sitting at a delicacy-laden table with the organisers, I mentioned that any money I wanted to donate would be used more effectively by me buying a plane ticket to a troubled third world country and giving cash directly to the people who would use it in the best way. The return trip would waste a lot less money than their so-called “infrastructure” and maybe more than 2% of the money might end up spent on the poor people it was intended for…

As a final note, I would like to mention two NGOs that are responsible for more deaths this century than just about any other organisation: the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) that most Americans mistakenly think is part of their government, and  the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) that guides British foreign policy.

And people wonder why voting never changes anything….


14
Jun
09

Are the ruling elites insane ?

Today, it’s time to jump into the deep end of internet strangeness.

In my search across the internet to find people who have in-depth experience with the most powerful movers and shakers of the planet – to glean more on what on earth they are up to – I recently came across a video which probably ranks as one of the weirdest interviews out there.

Before you watch it, I’m going to put it into perspective a little; first a famous speech – but not well enough known – from J. F. Kennedy in 1961, who was obviously worried about the influence of secret societies before his untimely demise:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnkdfFAqsHA

How times have changed in the american mainstream press since then ! For the worse unfortunately…

For the other side of the coin, and a possible explanation, here is an almost opposing speech from that charming personage David Rockefeller in June 1991, 30 years later, at the Bilderburg conference in Baden Baden, Germany:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.

So far they sound like pretty rational, reasonable people, don’t they, even if on one side – the Bilderburgers – their objectives seem to be downright fascist… but on both occasions these members of the “power elite” were talking to a large assembly in a conference. What is strange is that I’ve listened or read about some of these types of people talking in private, or at least off the record, and they often say very strange things in an informal or private context. Things so strange one could ask oneself if they are actually living on the same planet as the rest of us !

This is where the weirdest video of the week comes in. A bit more explanation before you watch it, if you will…

The two people talking in it are Princess Kaoru Nakamaru of Japan and Prince Leo Lyon Zagami of Italy.

Princess Nakamaru has devoted most of her life to understanding the mechanisms of world power in order to promote peace worldwide over the last 50 years (she is 73 now, getting on a bit…). She is widely respected in Asia and other parts of the world as a “spiritualy awakened” peaceworker, who has traveled to nearly 200 countries and met the most important world leaders directly, presidents, mighty industrialists and financiers in order to ask them simple, often disturbingly (for them) direct questions about their real efforts to promote goodwill and respect between all humans. She set up The International Affairs Institute for World Peace with part of her inheritance – 5 Billion dollars (!!!) according to this and has published many books (in Japanese mostly, unfortunately) relating her experiences talking to power brokers and her analysis. She has been deeply concerned for years about what she calls “the world underground government” and their methods – using financial warfare to destroy entire cultures – that she defines as criminal and immoral. Princess Nakamaru is also reputedly highly involved with some of the largest, oldest and most powerful Asian families and secret societies, who are apparently having a dimmer and dimmer view of the western oligarchy’s recent abuses of their own power and the world – that includes Asia of course.

Prince Leo Lyon Zagami is one of the most controversial characters to appear on the internet in recent years. He is allegedly a lifetime member (as is his whole family – it’s a generational tradition thing apparently) of just about every western secret society anyone has ever heard of, including (but this only scratches the surface) the order of Malta; several different freemasonry rites; he is Grand Master of the Ordo illuminatorum Universalis and the Monaco Freemason lodge – can’t remember it’s name, a Supreme Magus of the Rosicrucian order, and a 33rd degree Mason, amongst other titles, and he has shown in the past a bewildering number of photos of himself with many powerful and shady personalities from Europe, the US, and Russia and photos and documentation backing up his membership in so many organisations. He allegedly even has high level contacts with with the Sufi Naqshbandi order under Sheikh Muhammad Nazim al-Haqqani which is also connected to the Gulen Movement and the Islamic brotherhood – according to him the Islamic version of freemasonry… There is little doubt he has moved in many strange and powerful circles, in his own words consorting with arms dealers, drug smugglers, and other well known financiers. He knows religions – Christian and Islamic – like the back of his hand. He is obviously rich enough to travel the world at will, with a permanent – large – entourage of bodyguards. Zagami has become such a controversial figure recently because he decided in 2008 to become a whistleblower concerning his western secret societies’ more unsavoury actions, and since then he has revealed his strength as an occult historian by revealing a huge amount of information – much of it surprisingly detailed and verifiable – about the inner workings and details of the esoteric groups he belonged to.

There is a lot of debate on whether he is the real thing, an imposter, an “agent manipulateur” or just downright mad ! Since then he has allegedly acquired the backing of many of his more humanistic occult brethren and is supposedly representing “the good side of the Illuminati”. The one undebatable fact is that he turns up regularly with the most extraordinary people, and makes some pretty extreme claims.

In this video he is allegedly representing the western secret societies and attempting to justify their actions to various esoteric entities of the east via the Princess at a meeting somewhere in Tokyo. Some pretty weird stuff comes up…

I’ll spare you the first part, where Kaoru Nakamaru presents herself and goes into her personal spiritual beliefs briefy (feel free to watch it on youtube if you are interested in her, or here in a longer previous interview)

Here are parts 2 and 3 where she has an exchange with Zagami:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NE6fcOjO1wM&feature=channel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp-hJXZ3J2s&feature=channel_page

How about that for… weird !

Several possibilities spring to mind immediately after watching, mainly:

– They are both mad. I mean barking up the tree hopping loony…

Well, really unfortunately that doesn’t seem to work for her because she has been too serious a person most of her career, has received decorations for her work, and people like King Hussein of Jordan and Ingrid Bergman are members of her foundation. Unless they are all stark raving bonkers of course… hmm, maybe a possibility there… She has had her strong spiritual views for quite some time, but plenty of other people do too, without necessarily making them mad as a hatter’s symposium. And she definitely has some clout and cojones; I vaguely remember her turning up on a peaceful visit to North Korea when the rest of the world was meeting in South Korea, which made her a bit controversial, but requires guts and a firm belief in yourself ! Some sources say that deadly nationalist ninja types would die to protect her anywhere in the world – must be a nice feeling to be so appreciated. In short a colourful – but not mad – straightforwardly well-intentioned old family Japanese billionairess.

As for Leo, temporary madness is a distinct possibility, but on the other hand maybe just a life spent wheeling and dealing with shady types and studying dark occult texts has driven him over the edge, despite his recently claimed crisis of conscience and vow to reveal all the crimes of his numerous brethren.

It’s so hard to know with Leo: he is totally consistant in the depth and breadth of his knowlege of a whole bushel of western secret societies, their histories and membership and has brushed shoulders with many rich and infamous people, has the recognised support of several gangs and militias around the world – some of which even vouch for him on youtube – who are a pretty tough bunch. He is allegedly never left by an impressive team of pro bodyguards, equipped with the latest. But his mannerisms don’t generate trust and he never seems to be quite sure which side he’s on.

And what’s all that about 2012 ? There is already too much rubbish proliferating about disaster happening in december 2012 without unhinged aristocrats getting involved too; unless they are the ones producing the disaster of course.

If you are bored one afternoon just google 2012 “_______” (insert disaster scenario here); it can be quite entertaining.

So what do you think of Kaoru and Leo ? There are some fascinating characters out there !

02
Jun
09

The latest joke buzzword in Finance: oversight

Don’t you get a fuzzy warm feeling too when the word “oversight” is used several times in the same soundbite from some polititian or economist ? It sounds reassuring that some important sounding body is being given the job of watching over our great and grimy financial institutions…

Unfortunately, the bigger the bank, the less the oversight.

If anyone out there still doubts how little oversight exists over the banks that hold the entire finances of powerful countries in their hands, here is a video of  the Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing of May 5, 2009

It would seem incredible, almost funny video if this was not the future debt of countless generations of americans that is being dealt with in such an arrogant, opaque way.

It seems to add insult to injury the federal Reserve is even making interest on the tax payer money used to bail out it’s own institutions.

No wonder US gun shops have broken all their records selling more ammunition over the last few months to american citizenry than ever in history…

Well, it is about time this vampiric system got changed, but it would be nice if it could be done in a peaceful, sensible way rather than the usual bloodbath.

To cut years of world-wide agony short maybe confiscating the assets of everyone involved at the top levels, investing the money in alternative energy and putting all big money wall street types to work replanting the amazon would be a good idea. Unfortunately our governments represent their interests and not ours, so they will prefer to let the world economy collapse, throw everyone in the West into debt-slavery from birth, and starve the third world to death. Sound improbable ? It’s happening as I speak…

The elite probably think they don’t need us peasants any more anyway, at least in such numbers – after all, since the “post war dream” we have developped science and technology enough already for them to all live in health and luxury from now on, with a few servants and all the cheap technology money can buy – the rest of us can be plunged into an impoverished dark ages.

But in stride with the “normalising the unthinkable” process, chipping away at humanity’s very essence, I’m sure a lot of people would ignorantly help them achieve that unspeakable end.

25
May
09

Revealing quotes about our economic system

As a follow-up to the “we’re all doomed” post & comments, I thought it would be appropriate to quote a few famous bankers and politicians on financial and banking policy. If you haven’t, please read that post first and the comments.

It seems we have all been dupes for well over a century believing we could leave in the hands of a few self-serving people almost total financial power over our industries, services and lives.

No wonder the world is in such a mess !

First the comments of a few American presidents:

Let’s start with good old Jeff. It seems that he saw it all coming:

If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their  currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of  all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. – Thomas Jefferson in the debate over the Re-charter of the Bank Bill (1809)

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. – Thomas Jefferson

… The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating. -Thomas Jefferson

Madison gets to the point:

History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by  controlling money and its issuance. -James Madison

How about Andrew Jackson ?

If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was  given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations. -Andrew Jackson

Abe Lincoln’s point of view:

The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and  credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of  consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. -Abraham  Lincoln

Roosevelt ?

Issue of currency should be lodged with the government and be protected from domination by Wall Street. We are opposed to…provisions [which] would place our currency and credit system in private hands. – Theodore Roosevelt

Hmm, seems like they were all pretty much against the current system. So what happened ?

Despite the warnings of many of his predecessors, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act changing the American financial structure radically. A few years later he wrote:

I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of  credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most  completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world. No longer a  Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. -Woodrow  Wilson

Now for the other side; let’s hear what some of the bankers have said about all this. Maybe we are misunderstanding their aims and intentions ?

The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing. -William Paterson, founder of the Bank of England in 1694, then a privately owned bank.

Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws. -Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild.

The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests. -The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money. And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hand the destiny of the people. – Reginald McKenna, as Chairman of the Midland Bank, addressing stockholders in 1924.

The banks do create money. They have been doing it for a long time, but they didn’t realise it, and they did not admit it. Very few did. You will find it in all sorts of documents, financial textbooks, etc. But in the intervening years, and we must be perfectly frank about these things, there has been a development of thought, until today I doubt very much whether you would get many prominent bankers to attempt to deny that banks create it. -H W White, Chairman of the Associated Banks of New Zealand, to the New Zealand Monetary Commission, 1955.

And that was in 1955… They have come a long way since then in streamlining and globalising their operations all the way up to the current disaster.

All the currently proposed solutions to this economic mess portrayed by our media only offer alterations to the system in place, or even worse, centralisation of all banking into “regulatory bodies” run by the very groups that created this iniquitious system to start with. A clear case of “wolves guarding the henhouse” don’t you think ?

The big question is: can anyone do anything about it, anywhere ?

Feel free to post any ideas in the “comments” section (link at the top of the post) Any more good quotes would be welcome too

23
May
09

Secret meetings between the Elite: a new trend or old habit ?

The elite of the American rich got together again in secret on May 5th at the Rockefeller university Presidential room. Present were: Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller Jr., Oprah Winfrey, George Soros, Ted Turner, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and many more. The estimated combined net worth of those at the meeting tops a staggering $200 billion.

IrishCentral.com reported on this first, days after the event.

They were alleged to be meeting to comment on the uncertain financial future and to discuss their philanthropic activities.

I find that slightly doubtful: why all the secrecy if they are discussing charity ? The lowest 20 percent of the U.S. population by income gives over twice as much as a percentage of their income as the wealthiest, highly mediatised 20 percent without resorting to media black-out secret meetings.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/194/story/737156.html

It seems that every day more aspects of our collective future are to be determined by financial supermen in undemocratic, undisclosed conclaves.

There is nothing new, historically, about the rich and powerful discussing the world’s fate behind closed doors – the only difference now being the huge increase in the number of people affected by their ideologies and decisions.

Feel free to comment via the link at the top 😉

20
May
09

Are we paranoid enough ? – Killer RFID chips

Dr. No would love this one: a Saudi inventor has invented an RFID chip that can be impanted in humans to track their wherabouts anywhere in the world, and kill them instantly through diffusion of a poison if needed.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98386

Sounds perfect for a bunch of uses – I’m sure secret services, mafia organisations, terrorist groups and crackpot dictators are drooling over it as we speak !

Just think of the advantages for any institution desiring absolute loyalty in it’s underlings.

Hostage taking would become much easier too: just inject the victims and if anyone comes to rescue them they’re toast !

As for terrorists, if they are not quite sure of the fanaticism of their human bomb, they just have to tell him he’ll die anyway if his bomb doesn’t go off at the right time – don’t be late !

Stifling dissent ? Easy: just inject the politically incorrect and if they say a word out of line press the button ! In fact, all citizens should be implanted at birth without their knowledge just in case they turn into “terrorists”. Slip a chip in with all those vaccinations – no-one would notice. Even if they did, tell them it’s their caring government that just wants to observe their health for their own good of course…

Remember those hypo dart rifles used in zoos and nature reserves ? Well, if you want to blackmail someone how about adding a chip to  a dart ?

Hmm, in the perfect world, we could have implanted schoolchildren suddenly taking truancy VERY seriously. As for those dangerous mental patients escaping all the time… we can put a definitive stop to that !

No, really, the most extreme conspiracy theorists just haven’t got enough imagination ! To think people weren’t even believing the possibility of microchipping humans not so long ago…





Recent Posts

Archives